3 ms·
Because it ultimately is a story of a corporate takeover. It is not as if they didn't had the control earlier. Reliance was a significant stakeholder of the com
by prateek_mir 12y ago
Because it ultimately is a story of a corporate takeover. It is not as if they didn't had the control earlier. Reliance was a significant stakeholder of the company earlier too.
- TheAuditor 12y agoSo again. Why is it not a story here? Either you did not read the article or you did not understand the inner currents, politics and business strategies involved. Read again.
- prateek_mir 12y agoSeriously? Posting this story in isolation presents an image that a downfall of media has begun, when in reality it is just a change of face. I have read the story, and I very well understand the movement under the surface. A comprehensive article about the continuous degradation on electronic media would have been suitable as it would have provided a complete image, instead of this, where it gives a peephole view to a very large problem.