3 ms·

I am not sure about that. I have seen several examples where the WP is way cheaper than the X alternative

• higherpurpose 12y ago
  Which makes Microsoft's strategy all the more confusing. At least if they decided to use a fork of Android for sub-$100 devices, then it would be one thing. But they're mixing it up with no clear vision. The only reason they are continuing to make them is because they got a lot of press for it, because a lot of people wanted "Lumia with real Android" - and most tech sites thought: "Not Lumia...and with a bad clone of Android, must be good enough, so let's write about it anyway". Without that press and misleading hype about "Nokia with Android", Nokia X would've never launched.
  • amrrs 12y ago
    Yes. No strategy at all. They want to sell everything. Just Sales figures? That qualifying factor won't let them survive in market for a long time. They need Strategy. If WP is their vision, they should just stick to it. Launching forked Android might be okay for Amazon, but for MSFT, if they keep on doing this and that too at this low cost, they are marketing for Google!
    • pmelendez 12y ago
      I agree but keep in mind that this phone was already done even before they launched WP's Lumias. So what they are doing is not killing an initiative that started at Nokia. I don't like the idea but I can see how this is consistent with the new Microsoft view of being more open.