2 ms·
The whole thing is a backdoor. Backdoor in a backdoor? Surprise! Of course it's backdoors all the way down ;) But of course, script kiddies aren't particularly
by kijin 12y ago
The whole thing is a backdoor. Backdoor in a backdoor? Surprise! Of course it's backdoors all the way down ;)
But of course, script kiddies aren't particularly good at securing the servers they pwned, are they? [1]
A couple of months ago, I wrote QADE [2] for fun, a "quick and dirty" PHP-based text editor and webshell for editing files and running commands remotely. I deliberately failed to implement any authentication-related feature, because I didn't want to give an illusion of security. A secure webshell is an oxymoron.
[1] https://blog.avast.com/2014/06/09/are-hackers-passwords-stronger-than-regular-passwords/ https://blog.avast.com/2014/06/09/are-hackers-passwords-stro...
[2] https://github.com/kijin/qade https://github.com/kijin/qade
- leni536 12y agoWhat about putting it behind https and use basic http auth? If it's only for you you can always have a self signed certificate.
- kijin 12y agoThat's exactly what I do with my own installation of QADE on my dev box. The README on GitHub recommends others to do the same, since it's pretty much the only way to make QADE secure.