> There's nothing inherently wrong with right on red As a pedestrian I disagree, because right-on-red means that I have to constantly keep scanning for vehic

> There's nothing inherently wrong with right on red As a pedestrian I disagree, because right-on-red means that I have to constantly keep scanning for vehicles that may not have been at the intersection when I started crossing. The second aspect is that the drivers of the vehicles are invariably looking to their left for oncoming traffic, rather than to their right where cyclists and 'crunchy' pedestrians exist.