Many posters here criticize the a anti-sports bias, but perhaps this bias is useful to an individual and a humanity? Popular games became popular because of th

Many posters here criticize the a anti-sports bias, but perhaps this bias is useful to an individual and a humanity? Popular games became popular because of the path-dependent random development some time ago, should we continue on with the status quo? Or should we try to engineer a new type of game with massive popularity that would be more beneficial to the society and the players and the watchers? I guess the latter. Afterwards, football, soccer, hockey sports popularity is based on marketing and are successful in large part because of the huge switching costs.