3 ms·
Thank for great fw. I'm by no mean a Ruby expert but finding Sinatra is so simple to create complex apps, and Rails is so complex atm to pick up. I'm making sl
by kureikain 12y ago
Thank for great fw.
I'm by no mean a Ruby expert but finding Sinatra is so simple to create complex apps, and Rails is so complex atm to pick up. I'm making slowly progress in Rails and always not sure if I done thing correctly in Rails way.
Lotus seems small enough, and good enouh, balance between Sinatra and Rails for me.
Keep up the good work.
Thanks.
- liveoneggs 12y agohttp://www.padrinorb.com/ http://www.padrinorb.com/ check it out
- kureikain 12y agoThis is so cool. Built on top of Sinatra. So I can consider it like chaplin to backbone, right? It creates an architecture on top of original framework.
- diegosouza 12y agoMy feeling is the same.
- CarlHoerberg 12y agosinatra is more powerful than you maybe have realize..
- jamesbritt 12y agobalance between Sinatra and Rails for me. Ramaze is that sweet-spot for me. http://ramaze.net http://ramaze.net
- kureikain 12y agoThank you for such a great link. It is also well-maintain. last commit was 2 months ago. Its base is small enough to understand for me too. I like to understand more Ruby by reading the code. However, Rails was so big to me. Thanks again.