I think we're just talking around one another. I don't understand how your criticisms are anything besides style, I suppose. If you dislike LC and distrust the

I think we're just talking around one another. I don't understand how your criticisms are anything besides style, I suppose. If you dislike LC and distrust the mechanics of CT then of course a paper which uses CT to unify LC with math and physics won't float your boat—but it's still perfectly cromulent.