3 ms·
It's not a representative test (as I'm only providing one source), but I'm seeing lots and lots of websites proving that CloudFlare is faster than Google's CDN.
by BtM909 12y ago
It's not a representative test (as I'm only providing one source), but I'm seeing lots and lots of websites proving that CloudFlare is faster than Google's CDN.
It might be because their "userbase" is still smaller than Google, but for now that might be 1 interesting reason to use CloudFlare.
http://www.baldnerd.com/make-your-site-faster-cloudflares-cdnjs-vs-google-hosted-libraries-shocking-results/ http://www.baldnerd.com/make-your-site-faster-cloudflares-cd...
- magicalist 12y agoNo clue about their relative speeds, but that test is pretty bad, as it seems to only measure transfer rate once the transfer starts, not total transfer time (including latency).
- BtM909 12y agoI just picked the first result from Google. This isn't StackOverflow, so I could imagine that the topicstarter would actually do some research himself.