6 ms·
#foocamp pulls strings at Google
- avibryant 17y agoI was there when this was taken. I'm pretty sure it was 2006. It was a small plane, and we were told ahead of time that it was coming, although this is cropped too small to see the fun stuff people did to prepare, like build a huge model of a cylon raider in a nearby field.
- rabble 17y agoyeah, it's funny, because you only see the people who didn't go out of their way to make funny things for the flyover.
- danw 17y agoIs this a new image of this weekend FooCamp or of the previously photographed one?
- wyday 17y agoTo one of the 9 upvoters in the know: can you tell us what this means? Google used a high rez picture of one piece of land. So, what's the point? Or is that the point? The fact that Google made an exception to its algorithm for a conference is newsworthy?
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- Hexstream 17y agoI think it's interesting. What I'm wondering is, does that mean given current technology and "infinite" budget, Google could have this high a resolution for the whole planet? What stumbling blocks, obvious or otherwise, are preventing such an upgrade? Or is this just a one-time hack where they took the picture from an helicopter or something... In other words, Will it Scale(tm)?
- growt 17y agoYes it's most likely from a plane or helicopter. Most of the highest resolution stuff in google maps/earth is (the big cities, etc). And no, it won't scale.
- aw3c2 17y agoA lot of the better images are aerial instead of from satellites. Close-up like this is not common though, costs would probably be insane. I guess this image was donated by an independent person to Google, a employee maybe.
- cdibona 17y agoActually, we booked an overflight (plane) a couple of years back at Foo.