3 ms·
The easy response is, "What? California wants to tax something? And at a high percentage? How is this news?" I don't get the vitriol against the flippers in th
by ScottWhigham 12y ago
The easy response is, "What? California wants to tax something? And at a high percentage? How is this news?"
I don't get the vitriol against the flippers in this scenario. Don't they provide a valuable service? I've seen the HGTV shows that have "flippers" coming in and spending (a) $400,000 cash for a foreclosed house, and then (b) investing another $150,000 in renovating the house, bringing it up to code, and adding designer touches. How is this not a good thing for the community? This is not something that a "normal buyer" could do. Most people can't buy foreclosures - you can't get your bank to approve a loan, for example. And even if you could buy a foreclosure, you need to have lots of dry powder to handle the unexpected. This is just not what most people can do.
Seriously - I don't get why people would be against this sort of thing.
- andymoe 12y agoThe problem is not that they are buying foreclosed homes, renovating and reselling them. The problem is that they are buying blocks of apartments, evicting elderly and low income tenants via Ellis Act to get around rent controls and then reselling them to those that can afford the higher real estate prices. But I generally agree that these types of laws tend to backfire and hurt supply which is the main problem causes by decades of NIMBY activism.