3 ms·
infowars is not a reputable site. Isn't it the same site that argued the that the Boston marathon bombings were perpetrated by the US government as an excuse to
by leorocky 12y ago
infowars is not a reputable site. Isn't it the same site that argued the that the Boston marathon bombings were perpetrated by the US government as an excuse to search houses in Boston?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- eropple 12y agoWhen information is presented by a source that has not been consistently wrong about just about everything they've ever asserted, I'm sure he will. There's no "information" there at all. There are claims by someone whose track record tends towards self-aggrandizing lies and unreliability. But you know that already. EDIT: For context, because he deleted his posts, `iterationx` (who "lives in the world you can't see", according to his profile, and who has something really fun[1] linked up in there) posted the following as the root post in this tree: > Not surprising. Part of the build up to WW3: Russia and China vs the West just like Orwell predicted. > Intel CEO Refuses to Answer Questions on Whether NSA can Access Processors http://www.infowars.com/intel-ceo-refuses-to-answer-question...* http://www.infowars.com/intel-ceo-refuses-to-answer-question... > “SECRET” 3G INTEL CHIP GIVES SNOOPS BACKDOOR PC ACCESS http://www.infowars.com/91497/* http://www.infowars.com/91497/* And his reply to `leorocky`: > Stop being such a stupid gatekeeper. Analyze each bit of information on its own merit. (Ordinarily, deletions are whatever, but this looks extra silly without context.) [1] - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn9t0m6eG4Q http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn9t0m6eG4Q - seriously, this is fun.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]