4 ms·
There's a skeptoid episode about the Pacific Garbage Patch: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132 http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132 "In 1988, Robert Day, David Sha
by Luyt 12y ago
There's a skeptoid episode about the Pacific Garbage Patch: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132 http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4132
"In 1988, Robert Day, David Shaw, and Steven Ignell submitted a report to NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) detailing the results of four years of sample collection and analysis of plastic fragments found floating in the Pacific Ocean. They found concentrations highest in the North Pacific Gyre. The authors cited wind and currents as the primary force driving the higher concentrations to the center of the Gyre. Concentrations of what? Number one, monofilament fishing line fragments; and number two, something called neuston plastic. Neuston plastic refers to particles that have been broken down to a small size and are now floating just at or below the surface of the water. Most plastic floating in the open ocean degrades quite quickly, due primarily to ultraviolet radiation. It becomes brittle and crumbles. When it reaches microscopic size, it competes with phytoplankton as a food source for zooplankton, and enters the food chain. That's not good for anyone. The authors used 203 sample stations, each about 450 square meters in size. 52.2% of these contained plastic fragments.
Got that? Only half of NOAA's football-field sized sample areas, in the center of the densest part of the Pacific "Garbage Patch", contain even detectable levels of microscopic plastic. Unacceptable to be sure; but hardly a solid island."
- gregschlom 12y agoFor precision's sake, 450 square meters is nowhere near the size of a football field, be it American Football or Association Football). Both have at least 5000 square meters. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_field http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_field
- rdam 12y agoNo one ever said it was a "solid island of plastic" except some uninformed members of the public. You're taking an urban legend to criticize a valid concern. That is like saying hackers can be stopped by banning ski masks because everyone knows a hacker is someone in a ski mask.
- Retric 12y agoFirst off 1988 is 26 years ago. Second, 450 square meters is about 1/9th of an acre or a little under 5,000 square feet which is not actually that big. Also, you don't really get uniformity with floating debris it's a mix of high and low concentrations the real issue is what the average concentration because you could double the amount of debris and still have large gaps. More to the point they are sampling that area not fully straining 450 square meters. PS: Not that I think this is an important issue, just trying to be clear.