4 ms·
My problem with most overloaded operators is that they too often have no sensible name. When I talk to myself while coding, I have no name to say out loud. I
by Flow 12y ago
My problem with most overloaded operators is that they too often have no sensible name.
When I talk to myself while coding, I have no name to say out loud.
I have nothing but a picture, when I try to remember the operator.
- JadeNB 12y agoWhile the names may or may not work for you, this has been considered: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7746894/are-there-pronounceable-names-for-common-haskell-operators http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7746894/are-there-pronoun... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3242361/haskell-how-is-pronounced http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3242361/haskell-how-is-pr... I got to this by Googling for the 'fish' operator, to which I vaguely remembered seeing a reference: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/c262b/the_fish_operator http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/c262b/the_fish_oper...