5 ms·
see also: "worse is better" and "fire your customers" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better http://sethgod
by dschobel 17y ago
see also: "worse is better" and "fire your customers"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/04/the_customer_is.html http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/04/the_customer...
aka "focus on high ROI stuff and cut everything else"
are we seeing a trend here yet folks or do we need to see this principle dressed up in anecdotes a few more times?
- idlewords 17y agoI think we're 80% of the way there
- akeefer 17y agoHonestly, it somewhat boggles my mind that the original poster (and the post he links to) could both discuss the issue without reference to "worse is better," as if this was some sort of new insight that Twitter and Facebook have made . . .
- Ras_ 17y agoWorse is better should be Less is more, because the article is about the number of features.
- toddh 17y agoI think you are right and have Worse-is-Better to the post. We are still telling and learning from 2000 year old stories so it probably doesn't hurt to play dress up :-)