3 ms·
Remember, spin can go both ways, even if it seems one party is better at it than the other, and I think that might be what the OP is trying to get across. Call
by mediaman 17y ago
Remember, spin can go both ways, even if it seems one party is better at it than the other, and I think that might be what the OP is trying to get across.
Call it the "Serious Sex Crimes Act."
Spin it as:
"America's worst sex offenders are putting our wives and daughters, our mothers and sisters, in increased danger because of a new political plan to force our police to spread their resources too thinly to put these criminals behind bars. Our choice is clear: put our families in danger, or return to a time when we prioritized our law enforcement to protect what is most valuable to all of us."
Done well, it would be difficult to fight -- any protest would be a direct attack on our families.
- eru 17y agoAnd spin it as a strengthen of sex laws against the worst offenders. The softening on the not-so-bad guys can be played down.
- andreyf 17y agoSounds nice having both just read the same article, but in the end, people rarely get gung-ho about "spreading law enforcement too thin". Example: war on drugs. It's just not an issue people care enough about to affect their vote. A better way to sell it is "iron brand the dude that might rape and kill your daughter (but not the mom of the now-married couple)".