> There simply is no non-OOP way to implement these things. Depending on your specific definition of OOP. I suspect what the author is talking about is the hi

> There simply is no non-OOP way to implement these things. Depending on your specific definition of OOP. I suspect what the author is talking about is the high level of coupling that occurred in a looooot of 90's/early 2000's codebases. It was a time of learning for many many people, but our industry as a whole, and the C++ community specifically, has learned a lot from those mistakes.