4 ms·
> I'm you're right that the experience is "almost always" sub-par. I would say "often", but not even "usually". I guess YMMV. There aren't actually many fair/a
by frostmatthew 12y ago
> I'm you're right that the experience is "almost always" sub-par. I would say "often", but not even "usually". I guess YMMV.
There aren't actually many fair/accurate comparisons around since most companies have either a shrink-wrapped product or a webapp. Rarely do you see both, and when there are I agree with jacquesm that the experience is almost always sub-par on the webapp [in comparison to the desktop app].
You can't really compare one company's webapp to another's non-webapp. i.e. you may feel GMail is better than Outlook, but since Google doesn't make a non-webapp version of GMail we don't know if that would be better than both Outlook and gmail.com. Microsoft does make a webapp version of Outlook, but I don't think many people find that better than "real" Outlook.
- jaegerpicker 12y agoGoogle does in fact make a non-web version of Gmail. Gmail.app for iOS and the Android port of gmail. Both of which are a MUCH better experience them the comparable mobile web apps.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- notreadbyhumans 12y agoApple's iWork suite is an example where someone is at least trying to make applications that run equally well within the browser, on mobile and on desktops.