The article was really hard for me to read, because the author just thinks so much differently from me. i.e. if an area is driving you mad, do you get instant

The article was really hard for me to read, because the author just thinks so much differently from me. i.e. if an area is driving you mad, do you get instant relief if you leave the area? It could still be chemical / something in the air that makes you hallucinate, but not talking about such basic questions is just so different from how I think. the next most basic question is whether there are actually any physical sounds at any frequency - if microphones aren't sensitive enough at certain frequencies to tell us, then I would lead with that. If they're sensitive enough, but show nothing, then I would lead with that and then show a differential as to why it's not psychosomatic, or a chemical poison that gives you this effect, etc. I just found this article too different from how I think to read through.