3 ms·
It's incumbent on IKEA to police unauthorized use of their trademark somehow, but that doesn't have to mean that they must start by sending a nasty letter. When
by michaelhoffman 12y ago
It's incumbent on IKEA to police unauthorized use of their trademark somehow, but that doesn't have to mean that they must start by sending a nasty letter. When Jack Daniels thought their trademark was being infringed, they started by sending a nice letter simply asking the infringer to stop.
http://abovethelaw.com/2012/07/cease-and-desist-letter-of-the-day-captain-jack-doesnt-need-mean-lawyers/ http://abovethelaw.com/2012/07/cease-and-desist-letter-of-th...
Another way to deal with unauthorized use of a trademark is to authorize it. So IKEA could have started with a letter asking IKEA Hackers suggesting a potential agreement and a nominal fee. An imperative cease and desist letter isn't required.
- doktrin 12y agoThe Jack Daniels C&D letter should be a case study in public relations. While not universal, people really do respond quite well when faced with civility and respect.