5 ms·
You forgot an option #3. Hone your pitch to management to get them to give you the time you need. Honestly I'd probably look for a new job, but with that opti
by frankwiles 12y ago
You forgot an option #3. Hone your pitch to management to get them to give you the time you need.
Honestly I'd probably look for a new job, but with that option off the table #1 runs the risk of you looking bad doing the bare minimum and having truly failing tests that pass the suite. #2 runs the risk of you doing a ton of work for free only to get a pat on the back and maybe a "good job" email.
What makes your management tick? Is it happy customers? Frame the discussion with "We had 47 customer impacting bugs that were missed by the test suite last month." Is it cost savings? "My team spent 312 man hours last quarter fiddling with the test framework when you could have been moving the product forward or fixing actual bugs".
Just because it's not "customer facing" doesn't mean it isn't "customer impacting".
- jfe 12y agoManagement is fixated on On-Time Delivery. We do have metrics showing that QA spends a lot of time re-running automated tests, but there's no direct proof that shows that the crappy framework is the cause.
- brudgers 12y agoAsk yourself why management is fixated on it. What is their business case? One clue that they have a solid one is their willingness to pay people to do something that sucks.