43 ms·

Yes, it's lame. The fallacy is clear: I surely wasn’t going to drive a car to the alternative transit sessions

• khafra 17y ago
  Whatever the motivation, the result was unambiguous--it's not like he was driving a Hummer H2 everywhere besides those sessions. There aren't many use cases where an electric bicycle is better than an acoustic bicycle, but a commute that's bikeable except for sweat production is one of them.
  • te_platt 17y ago
    Upvoted for using acoustic bicycle as the opposite of electric bicycle. As to the article, the bike is lame if it doesn't do what he wants it to do otherwise get over what other people think.
  • me2i81 17y ago
    Having a big hill as part of a commute and bad knees is a perfectly reasonable use case.
• mmt 17y ago
  Downvoted that much, yet nobody even bothers to suggest that the quoted statement is not fallacious, nor that my conclusion is therefore faulty. For shame.