Where did I say they were useless? When I say that static typing as a religion does not appeal to me, I mean that I think dynamically-typed languages are reaso

Where did I say they were useless? When I say that static typing as a religion does not appeal to me, I mean that I think dynamically-typed languages are reasonable choices for some kinds of programs, and that I do not agree with the sentiment quoted in the article that their use should be considered grounds for revocation of one's degree. That doesn't mean I don't see the point of static typing as well.