This is what struck me about the decision. The article claims that "[t]rademarks that belittle other groups are not permitted under federal law." Yet it seem

This is what struck me about the decision. The article claims that "[t]rademarks that belittle other groups are not permitted under federal law." Yet it seems problematic that the office gets to decide then thi is the case. If something is legally protected speech, however offensive it may be, it should be eligible for trademark protection.