>Anyone using my GPL-licensed code in their projects must release their subsequent projects under the GPL as well. Yes, GPL's reason for existing is to grant a

>Anyone using my GPL-licensed code in their projects must release their subsequent projects under the GPL as well. Yes, GPL's reason for existing is to grant and preserve rights to end users, which is something it can only do if granting those rights to end users is a condition within the licence. >These projects were licensed under the terms of the GPL, therefore my ongoing contributions are also licensed under the GPL. He can also licence his code contributions under any other licence he so chooses alongside with GPL (aka dual licencing), which is something he is either unaware of (which I doubt), or wilfully chooses to ignore here. >If I could, I’d re-license these projects under a more permission license like MIT, but I’m not permitted to do so by the license under which I received them. Indeed, he is not allowed to re-licence other people's code, quelle surprise! Again he can offer his own code contributions under MIT or any other licence if he so wishes.