4 ms·

Um, it did come from a Native American group. Not that your opinion on whether or not something is an "actual movement" matters to anyone but yourself...

• protomyth 12y ago
  You didn't actually read the document with the named-non-group plaintiffs.
  • dragonwriter 12y ago
    The plaintiffs are individual persons because of the standing issues related to disparagement claims), and ones just past the age of legal adulthood specifically to negate the laches defense raised in the immediately previous case on the same issue (the Harjo case, whose procedural history is discussed at length in the decision, and whose trial record was adopted wholesale in this case by mutual consent of the parties, because the substantive issues in this case are a subset of those in the Harjo case. So, while its nice that you read the named plaintiffs, it would probably help if you read the document beyond the names of the parties to get a clear understanding of what is actually going on.
    • protomyth 12y ago
      I'm pretty well aware of what's going on, hard not to be where I'm standing. I didn't see the support I would want to see, but I wouldn't expect it given earlier actions.