3 ms·
Thank you. I have long been trying to pin down the description of, and term for, that principle. http://t.bigboxcar.com/post/87256202522/bullshit-asymmetry-prin
by ctdonath 12y ago
Thank you. I have long been trying to pin down the description of, and term for, that principle. http://t.bigboxcar.com/post/87256202522/bullshit-asymmetry-principle-via http://t.bigboxcar.com/post/87256202522/bullshit-asymmetry-p...
There's still a corollary in need of succinct definition/labeling: in context of a casual discussion, you make a fair point in a one liner with no citation, then someone criticizes it (in effect) for lacking peer-reviewed encyclopedic depth & thoroughness. (Ex.: "this car does 0 to 60MPH in 10 seconds" "uh, NO, you're not taking relativity into account! and you didn't cite any certified testing labs!" and from social context you feel compelled to elaborate on why your comment was sufficient, while the other loudly labels you a liar, ignores your objections, and marches off to disrupt other sane conversations.)
- Confusion 12y agoWhich is why I'm not going to challenge the accusation of 'bullshit'. I don't think the principle applies here. It does suggest I need to clarify that I believe that it is both the great strength and the great weakness of corporations.