The bad Latin is bad enough that anyone can credibly state that it's a hugely unlikely coincidence, but still only a coincidence. Well, at that point the argum

The bad Latin is bad enough that anyone can credibly state that it's a hugely unlikely coincidence, but still only a coincidence. Well, at that point the argument becomes irrefutable. "The fact that the evidence is weak is actually making it stronger, because they have to make it look weak." This is Bible Code stuff. I'm unconvinced.