5 ms·
Not updating a website people use regularly is not a bad thing - people are used to the UI, and changing shit only ruins the experience when people need to re-l
by sparkie 12y ago
Not updating a website people use regularly is not a bad thing - people are used to the UI, and changing shit only ruins the experience when people need to re-learn how to use the damn thing.
Also, it's not like MAL is "not updated", since it constantly has new content added - much of it user contributed, but those contributions get locked up behind a server, and we don't have access to it except through the website itself.
I don't suppose you would be offering the ability to query data, which will inevitably be user-contributed?
- PLejeck 12y agoHummingbird already offers an API through Mashape, which is infinitely more thorough than any competitor's. Additionally, MAL has lots of minor bugs, and how can you trust a site that hasn't been maintained in 5 years to store your password correctly? 2009 was a scary place. This is pure speculation, but I wouldn't be surprised if MAL is storing passwords as MD5+salt. They do just email it to you in plaintext when you register. And recovery is a 6 digit pin, which is totally plenty of entropy.
- jhenkens 12y agoYou register and login over HTTP. I would bet they just store it in plaintext. But does it really matter with the first piece of information, how they store your password?
- mijoharas 12y agoughhhh. I find it so hard to understand that this is still a thing that happens on the internet nowadays.
- shaldengeki 12y agoI can confirm that at least as of 2012 or so they were storing passwords as a salted md5 hash. I did point out to a staff member that this was not a good idea and was brushed off, so I assume this hasn't changed since then.