4 ms·
Because they're greedy and care more about having access to the enormous YouTube audience than being in control of their fan relationship.
by dublinben 12y ago
Because they're greedy and care more about having access to the enormous YouTube audience than being in control of their fan relationship.
- EGreg 12y agoBut what if there was a decentralized social network that allowed people to visit their site and immediately get a personalized experience as if they were logged in across this decentralized network? Why would people need to HOST their stuff on the centralized servers?
- dublinben 12y agoThat sounds a lot like Pump.io or Diaspora. MediaGoblin is going to support federation soon as well.
- EGreg 12y agoI personally think there should be a protocol that would turn everything into one big social network where you could sign up on any server and then OAuth to other servers. We are building it: http://platform.qbix.com http://platform.qbix.com (Better than Diaspora* :)
- sehr 12y agoThat was a slick transition from healthy conversation to self promotion
- EGreg 12y agoHappens when you're passionate about what you're building and few others have spent as many man hours
- walterbell 12y agoDid you consider an open-source or dual-licensing business model? See http://www.1060research.com/products/ http://www.1060research.com/products/ for an example.
- EGreg 12y agoElaborate :)
- walterbell 12y agoThe FAQ's explain when a license is needed: http://www.1060research.com/resources/#open http://www.1060research.com/resources/#open Essentially, if the code that uses the framework is open-source, then the framework can be used with a public license at no charge. If the code that users the framework is proprietary, then the framework has a license fee.