4 ms·
> The Government believes that, even when privacy violations happen, it is not an “active intrusion” because the analyst reading or listening to an individual’s
by digitalengineer 12y ago
> The Government believes that, even when privacy violations happen, it is not an “active intrusion” because the analyst reading or listening to an individual’s communication will inevitably forget about it anyway.
unbelievable! What if they're building a searchable database of every user, so as to have 'dirt' on someone when he 'becomes a threat' to their interests? (Like becoming a spokesman against this sort of thing or whatever the bureaucrats wantto do next year).
- dan_bk 12y agoWhen I read such things ("...because the analyst reading or listening to an individual’s communication will inevitably forget about it anyway."), it fills me with deep hate against those people. How dare they take us for such idiots?