4 ms·
Definitely not. Most of mobile software strives to run at 60fps. That's just 16.7ms.
by imaginenore 12y ago
Definitely not. Most of mobile software strives to run at 60fps. That's just 16.7ms.
- rasz_pl 12y agodisplay animation at 60fps and react to a hardware input through layers and layers of software abstraction are two different things. Run of the mill 3M controller has 5ms latency http://datasheet.octopart.com/87-5961-211-3M-datasheet-21189709.pdf http://datasheet.octopart.com/87-5961-211-3M-datasheet-21189... 5 year old Fujitsu FMA1127 had 10ms. http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/MICRO/fme/tsc/FMA1127_Data_Sheet_FINAL_021209.pdf http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/MICRO/fme/tsc/FMA1127_Data_... Interrupt latency is measured in nano seconds.
- imaginenore 12y agoIf you had read the PDF, 5ms is the "minimum touch time", which is not latency, but a minimum touch time it can register. The same software has no problem rendering complex games and doing all kinds of game logic, all in 16.7ms. What makes you think asking for a touch input will take 15 times longer?
- rasz_pl 12y agoActually its response time. I already gave you an example of software stack impact on latency - Android sound lag went down from >250ms to respectable 10ms for some Nexus devices. Blame buffers.
- imaginenore 12y ago> Actually its response time. Actually, no, it isn't.
- rasz_pl 12y ago"This controller is well known for its < 5.4 milliseconds response time"