3 ms·
You're right - it doesn't have to be the government's job to educate people... ...We could just as easily act like, say, Jamaica, in the township of Treasure
by chillingeffect 12y ago
You're right - it doesn't have to be the government's job to educate people...
...We could just as easily act like, say, Jamaica, in the township of Treasure Beach, where the government does not educate the children, leaving them to farm ackee, sell souvenirs on the beach and fish for a living.
However, the government is under our control, and as a group, our collective people who came before us figured out it was extremely valuable to educate people. And since then, every generation has valued education even more.
So, even if your personal values preclude the government from educating people and you prefer aristocracy and a severe gap between peasants and oligarchy, you are fortunately vastly outnumbered by others who believe in either a. a chance at equality, or b. the power of educated as a group for promoting the nation's interests.
- iterationx 12y agoThe government is not under "our" control. That's a naive and stupid fantasy.
- esbranson 12y agoYou're playing word games. I take the meaning of "control" is the argument as "de jure" control, in the sense of "for the People", while you have in essence redefined the word to mean "de facto" control, in the sense of the undue influence of money in politics. Your redefinition makes your point irrelevant to the argument made.