> claims the ozone hole was not due to CFCs Was there any even halfway plausible evidence for this in 2001? The only things I can find on this are in 2007, th

> claims the ozone hole was not due to CFCs Was there any even halfway plausible evidence for this in 2001? The only things I can find on this are in 2007, there was some indication that the Cl2O2 photolysis rate was much lower than expected. But that appears to have been resolved in 2009. http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090507/full/news.2009.456.html http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090507/full/news.2009.456.ht...