3 ms·

I think the point is that individual locations should be free to set their own regulations - at the building level at least. But city or state-wide ordnances

by brc 12y ago

I think the point is that individual locations should be free to set their own regulations - at the building level at least. But city or state-wide ordnances against subletting or ride-sharing are too broad and allow certain actors to amass too much monopoly power.

aestra 12y ago
>But city or state-wide ordnances against subletting Many places (like NY for example) actually have laws that expressly protect tenants rights to sublet. Landlord tenant laws mostly are there to protect the tenant from unfair slumlords.