3 ms·
I definitely think you'd find the unikernel approach interesting and should take a look [1]. I've got a version of my website deployed this way too [2]. [1] ht
by amirmc 12y ago
I definitely think you'd find the unikernel approach interesting and should take a look [1]. I've got a version of my website deployed this way too [2].
[1] http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2566628 http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2566628
[2] http://amirchaudhry.com/from-jekyll-to-unikernel-in-fifty-lines/ http://amirchaudhry.com/from-jekyll-to-unikernel-in-fifty-li...
- lbotos 12y agoI've wanted to play around with this. Thanks for the great write up. Anyone know of a hosting provider/layer focusing on this workflow?
- amirmc 12y agoDeploying to EC2 is an option [1]. In general, we want to make it easy for people to deploy to the public cloud and will release tools to aid this. [1] http://www.somerandomidiot.com/blog/2014/04/23/verb-your-own-noun/ http://www.somerandomidiot.com/blog/2014/04/23/verb-your-own...
- lbotos 12y agoI guess what I meant was there any "heroku" like platforms that offer mirage. I've been kicking the idea around for a while (I think unikernel is the future of PaaS/SaaS/Cloud) and wondering what the field looks like. :)
- amirmc 12y agoYup, I did understand what you meant but I stopped short of saying 'Heroku for Unikernels' (even though this how I think of it). I didn't want to give you a false impression of the first steps, which will be FOSS tools for anyone to deploy to the cloud. Ultimately, we may be able to run something as a service with much more fine-grained billing than current providers.