4 ms·
You're right in many ways, but you should read the article. It's not your run-of-the-mill tech article about "depression" being a temporary sadness brought on b
by jonnathanson 12y ago
You're right in many ways, but you should read the article. It's not your run-of-the-mill tech article about "depression" being a temporary sadness brought on by work-related stress, the founder's lifestyle, or any of that typical pablum. It's the personal story of someone who is clinically depressed, has been hospitalized for that depression, and wants to make understanding of depression -- actual depression, not strawman-depression -- more widespread and accepted.
Why should she have written this for TechCrunch? Why not? The tech industry exerts enormous pressure to signal that one is a rockstar, that everything is better than fine, and that you're not just keeping up with the Joneses; you're lapping them. It's about time the tech press talked about depression as it really is, and not "depression" as a neutered buzzword for stress. And it's about time someone -- anyone -- restarted the national dialogue regoing about clinical depression and mental health.
In 2014, the stigma surrounding depression is every bit as harsh as it was in 1998, when I was diagnosed. In some ways it's even harsher. That really sucks. We need people to talk about it, and to be honest, the more people talking about it, the better. If one of those places happens to be TC, and so long as TC isn't peddling a watered-down version of the topic, I'm all for it. By the same token, if Sam Altman wants to talk about depression and wants to do his part to alleviate the stigma, I'm all for it. None of these articles is ever going to be perfect, or capture 100% of the issue. But I'm glad we're getting these articles, nonetheless. For decades, this was something people just didn't talk about or admit to in public. I'll take public.
- michaelochurch 12y agoIn 2014, the stigma surrounding depression is every bit as harsh as it was in 1998, when I was diagnosed. In some ways it's even harsher. That really sucks. I think it's worse. People are more aware of the illness itself, but there's more conformity, which means that it's harder to find accommodation for symptoms that are mild but embarrassing (e.g. needing a quiet room, instead of an open-plan hell, to recover from a panic attack). What's new and upsetting is the competitive conformity of the Millennial generation (or maybe I'm just biased against my won age group). Gen Xers in 1995 may have had to show up for work at 9:00 and wear slacks, but they didn't rat each other out. They knew it was them against the system. The rising generation seems to have more house-slave types who'll rat each other out. I don't mind conforming (to a reasonable degree) and I don't mind competing, but when people compete to conform I just want to punch everyone in the face.
- methodover 12y agoAbout the need for a quiet room -- I totally agree with you. I wonder how many engineers talk about needing a door which can close for reasons like 'I need to focus' when the real reason is 'I have an anxiety disorder which is exasperated by chaos and eased by quiet.' I know I've said the first without mentioning the second. In fact I turned down an offer purely because of an office plan which would put me between a Ping pong table and a room full of people (in an open office plan).