I entirely disagree. Illumina actual error rates (as opposed to base quality) is less systematic than current Oxford Nanopore reads, which there are admittedly

I entirely disagree. Illumina actual error rates (as opposed to base quality) is less systematic than current Oxford Nanopore reads, which there are admittedly very few in public. Pac Bio SMRT kits are super cheap and highly multiplexed (ie produce a lot more data) in comparison to Oxford Nanopore. The error rates are lower, average read lengths higher. I don't see any large market so far for ONP. Of course with better data and lower error rates things might change..