How can your comment completely disregard the entirety of my actual conclusion? >It's not a sufficient method to describe a person's strengths and weaknesses.

How can your comment completely disregard the entirety of my actual conclusion? >It's not a sufficient method to describe a person's strengths and weaknesses. So, there should be if your classifications are correct. You are assuming that 'CS Professor' is equatable to 'good CS People'. But, my classification may not be so rigid. EDIT: You also still have not defined what it means to be a 'Good Programmer' vs. a 'Horrible' one.