3 ms·
You've just proven my point while cleverly but unsuccessfully trying to avoid being responsive to my inquiry. Java was never adopted in any form by a standards
by nknighthb 12y ago
You've just proven my point while cleverly but unsuccessfully trying to avoid being responsive to my inquiry. Java was never adopted in any form by a standards body, three of the remaining four are an already-small and ever-shrinking share of the industry, and ECMAScript is never up to date with the latest developments in JavaScript.
- gress 12y agoEven if you are right, and I'd only grant you that I am partially wrong about java because the JCP has collapsed since the Oracle takeover - the rest are just you adding qualifiers to minimize the contradiction, so what? Your position is simply to dismiss the value of standards and state that it's fine that Dart is proprietary. Also your statement about ECMAScript is flat out disingenuous. JavaScript implementations may move ahead between ECMAScript standards, but it is standardized, and by a real cross-industry group, not just a rubber stamp from one company. It is hard to take seriously an assertion that the level of standardization between Dart and JavaScript is comparable.
- nknighthb 12y agoNobody made that assertion. You made an assertion that standardization is "a pretty significant factor". You've yet to clarify what it's a significant factor in, nor have you provided evidence that it is, in fact, significant. I also didn't state that it's fine that Dart is proprietary, and I'd appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. My position is that your premise is incorrect and Dart is not proprietary.