3 ms·
Very classic indeed and very inventive way of solving it. The article should have [2006] in the title though.
by tmikaeld 12y ago
Very classic indeed and very inventive way of solving it.
The article should have [2006] in the title though.
- ColinWright 12y agoDone that - thanks.
- hcles 12y ago> This classic article from Mario Wolczko first appeared on Usenet in 1986. An argument could be made that [1986] would be more accurate.