There was never any evidence that she stole the kids, or that they had ever belonged to anybody else. In fact, there was a vast amount of reliable, historical e

There was never any evidence that she stole the kids, or that they had ever belonged to anybody else. In fact, there was a vast amount of reliable, historical evidence that they were her kids. The _only_ evidence to the contrary turned out to be wrong, and it was proven wrong when she was observed giving birth. Otherwise, even if she had stolen the kids, the government action was insane. As I already pointed out, it costs social services a lot more to break up a functioning family than it costs to provide enough support to keep it together.