> Come on guys, is it so hard to understand that if you exchange an asset for a security, you don't own the asset anymore? In this case this fact is directly c

> Come on guys, is it so hard to understand that if you exchange an asset for a security, you don't own the asset anymore? In this case this fact is directly contrary to a worldview held by many at HN, so I suspect everyone pointing out how property law actually works is in for a long slog.