2 ms·

It yields the results of each regex element separately, so it's hard to come up with a functional implementation capped results. Still, I'll look into it. But

by ssarah 12y ago

It yields the results of each regex element separately, so it's hard to come up with a functional implementation capped results. Still, I'll look into it. But even then, the main question is if you really want to see the head of a list of billions of combinations like you propose?

corobo 12y ago
(Not OP) No, not the billions, but yes the results of other searches when filtering by ".com available" such as (:colors:)((:words/adverbs:)|(:words/verbs:)) and then maybe if I also limit the length of the domain from there - there wont then be billions of results As a side to that, could :colors include more of them? There's definitely more than 12 usable colour names!
- ssarah 12y ago
  Since the results are stacked on the browser, for that particular search you typed, you could always search (:colors:)(:words/verbs:) and (:colors:)(:words/adverbs:) separately and I believe you will get the full list you want. But I really have to generate the regex and availability results before being able to apply the filters. As for the colors: yes the sets need to be improved. (: You got some suggestions?