3 ms·

This is great, but the "please keep it under.." issue made it unusable. Limited to .com, I couldn't use this pattern: [a-z]{4,8}coin If that's not workable, I

• ssarah 12y ago
  It yields the results of each regex element separately, so it's hard to come up with a functional implementation capped results. Still, I'll look into it. But even then, the main question is if you really want to see the head of a list of billions of combinations like you propose?
  • corobo 12y ago
    (Not OP) No, not the billions, but yes the results of other searches when filtering by ".com available" such as (:colors:)((:words/adverbs:)|(:words/verbs:)) and then maybe if I also limit the length of the domain from there - there wont then be billions of results As a side to that, could :colors include more of them? There's definitely more than 12 usable colour names!
    • ssarah 12y ago
      Since the results are stacked on the browser, for that particular search you typed, you could always search (:colors:)(:words/verbs:) and (:colors:)(:words/adverbs:) separately and I believe you will get the full list you want. But I really have to generate the regex and availability results before being able to apply the filters. As for the colors: yes the sets need to be improved. (: You got some suggestions?