He said that punches driving facial evolution was fine as a hypothesis, it just needs evidence and he hasn't seen any. His characterization of this as a just-s

He said that punches driving facial evolution was fine as a hypothesis, it just needs evidence and he hasn't seen any. His characterization of this as a just-so story, glib and light on evidence, doesn't just accurately describe this one specific claim; there are dozens or hundreds more just like it. On any given day, you can probably find an equally vacuous story about evolutionary psychology in some newspaper. It's a lame excuse for science.