4 ms·
I think display are, for now, the better option. AR and VR are still far too in their infancy for them to be as intuitively useful as a room full of displays is
by knowaveragejoe 12y ago
I think display are, for now, the better option. AR and VR are still far too in their infancy for them to be as intuitively useful as a room full of displays is to NASA or a power grid operations team(per his example). That will change with time of course, but for something we can do now and over the next few years I think displays and projectors are the way to go. In a way, the projectors over the worktable he shows are(in effect) a limited form of augmented reality.
- greggman 12y agoI guess the question is how many years? How many years until we have the libraries, servers, sensors, visualizers, and other systems in place for make this a reality? Assuming it's 5 years (probably over estimating) where will fb oculus be? If it happens to have become fb oculus glass, something you wear that can augment the world this system of Bret's will come to fruition just as there displays are no longer needed I guess that's irrelevant though as switching displays will be trivial. The real work is in the software