3 ms·

I feel like I'm missing something. I haven't used databases much, but don't most SQL implementations already "figure out" the most efficient way to perform que

I feel like I'm missing something. I haven't used databases much, but don't most SQL implementations already "figure out" the most efficient way to perform queries? Can't most implementations already perform queries in parallel?

AaronFriel 12y ago
Yes, but this is designed for non-SQL datastores, and arbitrary application code connecting portions of "data acquisition" and "data operation". Imagine if instead of an ORM, you had a single system that weaved together your application code and the database queries, and ensured that where they could execute in parallel, they did.
- thisisdave 12y ago
  That makes sense. Thanks