10 ms·
What's really amazing is that this -- all this -- was for rank speculation!!! There was not one scrap, not one scrap of evidence of any mechanical interest, or
by logicallee 12y ago
What's really amazing is that this -- all this -- was for rank speculation!!! There was not one scrap, not one scrap of evidence of any mechanical interest, or ability, or optical devices in Vermeer's life or among his possessions. It would be one thing if he thought Da Vinci had done it. But Vermeer?
And yet he said, no, you can tell by the paint chips. That is an absolutely amazing amount of dedication to verifying something without looking at any evidence whatsoever but the end result.
I couldn't have done it. I would have given up after a lack of any corroborating evidence.
- speleding 12y agoAlthough the article doesn't mention it, there is evidence that Vermeer had access to optical devices: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, inventor of the microscope, born in the same year (1632) lived very close to Vermeer in Delft and was named the executor of his will, so they must have known each other well.