4 ms·
Does it strike anyone else as odd that they don't highlight security updates as Chrome does? Example, http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2014/05/stable-ch
by cauterize 12y ago
Does it strike anyone else as odd that they don't highlight security updates as Chrome does? Example, http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2014/05/stable-channel-update_20.html http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2014/05/stable-chan... Maybe it's psychological, but I like the reassurance security is a focus for Chrome.
- higherpurpose 12y agoMaybe because it doesn't seem to be their main priority (where's my sandbox at?): http://www.extremetech.com/computing/178587-firefox-is-still-the-least-secure-web-browser-falls-to-four-zero-day-exploits-at-pwn2own http://www.extremetech.com/computing/178587-firefox-is-still...
- pix64 12y agohttps://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis > The two major advantages of this model are security and performance. Security would improve because the content processes could be sandboxed (although sandboxing the content processes is a separate project from Electrolysis). Sandboxing Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925570 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925570
- st3fan 12y agoYou can see the security advisories here: https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ https://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/
- pix64 12y agohttp://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefo...