3 ms·
Well it seems to me that it would be an considered accidental death. Of course, if 75% of egg fertilizations result in the death of a person, then having unprot
by afarrell 12y ago
Well it seems to me that it would be an considered accidental death. Of course, if 75% of egg fertilizations result in the death of a person, then having unprotected sex shows a callous disregard for human life.
- acqq 12y agoStill in the article case, there's certainly no "death" of the genetic information of both "twins." They both still live inside of the same body: one in some organs, another in the rest of the organs of the same body. If the "person" exist as soon as the egg and sperm mix, both of the mixes exist and live in the same body, that is, both "persons" according to that (in my opinion, just constructed out of the suspicious religious premises) definition are alive. And under different definition of the person (which I prefer, as something that has to have "a personality" to be considered as a person) there was always only one person: the woman that has different DNA in different organs of her. The joining of the different cells happened before a functional organism existed, and since then, it's only one.